SSLX against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?
Risk band
Critical
partial confidence
A floor: the real band can only be worse.
- Max safe collateral
- 0.11 USDC (shortened; full value 0.1153538500018095351553925 USDC)Limited by manipulation cost
- Depth within 5%
- buy143.54 USDC (shortened; full value 143.543586688841092904985137181 USDC)sell91.16 USDC (shortened; full value 91.165213109322861117323255825637368769429176444918 USDC)
- Cost to reach the critical move
- The engine sent no critical rung
- Checks
- 5 triggered3 not evaluated
History
Every stored reading from this source, whenever it was taken
A reconstruction is written where a replay ran rather than on the scan's cadence, so there is no window to choose: the engine returns the readings it holds and the axis below is labelled from them.
No readings were stored in this range from this source
The engine holds no stored reading for Offers implied on this asset. A reconstruction exists only where keel replay has been run, and it has been run on one pair.
Checks
Triggered5
- Cheap to move the price
- Cheap next to real trading
- One holder owns most of it
- Thin depth at 5%
- Supply is concentrated
Not evaluated3
- No genuine trade in 30 days
- No genuine trade in 7 days
- Volume may be wash traded
Evidence
The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.
Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth is real.
- Largest holder
- 77.9663 % (shortened; full value 77.96637994886997226241759835 %)
- Top ten holders
- 85.6627 % (shortened; full value 85.66275338468575535710858499 %)
- Concentration index
- 6,091.51 (shortened; full value 6091.5132193288181864020313038725580132528951637402883887)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used