GQX against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?
Risk band
High
partial confidence
A floor: the real band can only be worse.
- Max safe collateral
- 23.65 USDC (shortened; full value 23.65055086371288274748540700578928317971344263883 USDC)Limited by liquidation depth
- Depth within 5%
- buy22.89 USDC (shortened; full value 22.8998409670330830205508156526 USDC)sell23.33 USDC (shortened; full value 23.339203851138224279366134021395120884365344341365 USDC)
- Cost to move +50%
- Not reachableThe order book cannot reach the target
- Checks
- 5 triggered3 not evaluated
History
Buy-side depth
What an order can absorb before the price moves against a buyer. The rungs are nested, so one scale covers all three.
Lower at the end of the window than at its start
- Lowest
- 9.31 USDC (shortened; full value 9.3135813392636735018327803891 USDC)
- Highest
- 96.48 USDC (shortened; full value 96.4836617801564933142001903494 USDC)
- 2% from mid
- 9.43 USDC (shortened; full value 9.4346902399209495164690174024 USDC)
- 5% from mid
- 23.41 USDC (shortened; full value 23.4149582894266548612211567327 USDC)
- 10% from mid
- 46.27 USDC (shortened; full value 46.2787446565778455863851898163 USDC)
22 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.
Checks
What fires now, how long it has been firing across the window above, and what could not run.
Extreme spreadnow
SPREAD_EXTREMEthroughout
Thin depth at 5%now
THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
One holder owns most of itnow
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREME21 of 22
Supply is concentratednow
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGH21 of 22
Price sources disagreenow
PRICE_SOURCE_CONFLICT14 of 22
Nothing tradable within 2%
ZERO_DEPTH_2PCT8 of 22
No genuine trade in 30 days
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_30D3 of 22
No genuine trade in 7 days
NO_GENUINE_TRADE_7D3 of 22
Not evaluated3
- No genuine trade in 30 days
- No genuine trade in 7 days
- Volume may be wash traded
Evidence
The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.
The engine answers only for ledgers a replay has stored, and says so when it has not. A stored past reading is rebuilt from the operation stream, so it carries its own gaps.