Skip to content
keel
Ledger
64,751,769
Methodology
1.0.8-draft
Age
5s

GQX against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?

All assets

GQX / USDC

GD7T…DAQF

Risk band

High

partial confidence

A floor: the real band can only be worse.

Max safe collateral
23.65 USDC (shortened; full value 23.65055086371288274748540700578928317971344263883 USDC)Limited by liquidation depth
Depth within 5%
buy22.89 USDC (shortened; full value 22.8998409670330830205508156526 USDC)sell23.33 USDC (shortened; full value 23.339203851138224279366134021395120884365344341365 USDC)
Cost to move +50%
Not reachableThe order book cannot reach the target
Checks
5 triggered3 not evaluated

No readings were stored in this range from this source

The engine accepted the request and returned nothing for Hubble. The series is as old as the deployment, so a window can reach back further than anything that was recorded. It is not empty because the figures were zero.

Checks

What fires now, how long it has been firing across the window above, and what could not run.

Triggered5

  • Price sources disagree
  • Extreme spread
  • One holder owns most of it
  • Thin depth at 5%
  • Supply is concentrated

Not evaluated3

  • No genuine trade in 30 days
  • No genuine trade in 7 days
  • Volume may be wash traded

Evidence

The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.

Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth is real.

Largest holder
99.9780 % (shortened; full value 99.97803098635098427590975248 %)
Top ten holders
99.9922 % (shortened; full value 99.99227805843989600743508676 %)
Concentration index
9,995.60 (shortened; full value 9995.6067163790535041155156982943598985719193623607857668)

Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution

Volume excluded as not genuine
not computed

the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used

Volume to supply, 30 day
not computed

the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used

Last genuine trade
not computed

the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used