4T against USDC — what depth stands behind this price?
Risk band
High
partial confidence
A floor: the real band can only be worse.
- Max safe collateral
- 31.16 USDC (shortened; full value 31.164296412500361552518577790154764254025255656558 USDC)Limited by liquidation depth
- Depth within 5%
- buy30.17 USDC (shortened; full value 30.1750949858970957078602110135 USDC)sell30.75 USDC (shortened; full value 30.754026630403190594248305334202784181453360759349 USDC)
- Cost to move +50%
- Not reachableThe order book cannot reach the target
- Checks
- 3 triggered5 not evaluated
History
Cost to move the price 50%
The stored series carries one manipulation rung, the +50% move. A reading the engine could not produce breaks the line rather than sitting at zero.
Too few readings in this window to show a direction.
No point in this range carried a value.
8 readings from horizon, with no gaps reported. One source per chart.
Checks
What fires now, how long it has been firing across the window above, and what could not run.
One holder owns most of itnow
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_EXTREMEthroughout
Thin depth at 5%now
THIN_DEPTH_5PCTthroughout
Supply is concentratednow
HOLDER_CONCENTRATION_HIGHthroughout
Not evaluated5
- Price sources disagree
- Extreme spread
- No genuine trade in 30 days
- No genuine trade in 7 days
- Volume may be wash traded
Evidence
The figures behind the verdict, as the engine served them.
Concentration and wash trading bound how much of the depth is real.
- Largest holder
- 99.9998 % (shortened; full value 99.99988403769260829589965769 %)
- Top ten holders
- 100 %
- Concentration index
- 9,999.97 (shortened; full value 9999.9768075586965637096982658318767432135837104294677942)
Herfindahl–Hirschman, over the holder distribution
- Volume excluded as not genuine
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Volume to supply, 30 day
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used
- Last genuine trade
- not computed
the newest trade reading is anchored more than 48h0m0s ago, so it was not used